Highlights
Overview
Technical Background
The Threat
Securing Nuclear Warheads and Materials
Interdicting Nuclear Smuggling
Stabilizing Employment for Nuclear Personnel
Monitoring Stockpiles
Ending Further Production
Reducing Stockpiles

 

divider
Help Using this Section
divider

Previous Publications

bullet

Nuclear Funding 2009"Funding for U.S. Efforts to Improve Controls Over Nuclear Weapons, Materials, and Expertise Overseas: a 2009 Update"
— a June 2009 NTI commissioned report by Andrew Newman and Matthew Bunn, Project on Managing the Atom

Read the Full Report (1.68M PDF)

bullet

Securing the Bomb '08 coverSecuring the Bomb 2008,
commissioned by the Nuclear Threat Initiative, finds that the world still faces a "very real" risk that terrorists could get a nuclear bomb. The Obama Administration must make reducing that risk a top priority of U.S. security policy and diplomacy, according to the report, which is accompanied by a paper offering a specific agenda for the presidential transition and the opening weeks of the new administration.

Read the Executive Summary (319K PDF) or the Full Report (1.28MB PDF)
Read "Preventing Nuclear Terrorism: An Agenda for the Next President"
Read the Release

bullet

Securing the Bomb 2007Securing the Bomb 2007,
commissioned by the Nuclear Threat Initiative, finds a dangerous gap in efforts to thwart nuclear terrorism and calls for urgent global campaign to reduce the risk.

The report provides a comprehensive assessment of efforts to secure and remove vulnerable nuclear stockpiles around the world and a detailed action plan for keeping nuclear weapons and their essential ingredients out of terrorist hands.
Read the Executive Summary (396K PDF)
or the Full Report (2.54M PDF)
Read the News Release
Visit washingtonpost.com for special Securing the Bomb 2007 interactive features.
Watch the Securing the Bomb slide show

bullet

Funding for U.S. Efforts to Improve Controls Over Nuclear Weapons, Materials, and Expertise OverseasFunding for U.S. Efforts to Improve Controls Over Nuclear Weapons, Materials, and Expertise Overseas: Recent Developments and Trends

February2007

Readthe Full Report (1.5M PDF)

bullet

Securing the Bomb 2006Securing the Bomb 2006
The latest report in our series, from May 2006, finds that even though the gap between the threat of nuclear terrorism and the response has narrowed in recent years, there remains an unacceptable danger that terrorists might succeed in their quest to get and use a nuclear bomb, turning a modern city into a smoking ruin. Offering concrete steps to confront that danger, the report calls for world leaders to launch a fast-paced global coalition against nuclear terrorism focused on locking down all stockpiles of nuclear weapons and weapons-usable nuclear materials worldwide as rapidly as possible.
Read the Executive Summary (379K PDF)
or the
Full Report (1.7M PDF)

bullet

Securing the Bomb 2005Securing the Bomb 2005:
The New Global Imperatives

Our May 2005 report finds that while the United States and other countries laid important foundations for an accelerated effort to prevent nuclear terrorism in the last year, sustained presidential leadership will be needed to win the race to lock down the world's nuclear stockpiles before terrorists and thieves can get to them.
Read the Executive Summary (281 K)
or the Full Report (1.9M PDF)

bullet

Securing the Bomb: An Agenda for Action
Building on the previous years' reports, this 2004 NTI-commissioned report grades current efforts and recommends new actions to more effectively prevent nuclear terrorism. It finds that programs to reduce this danger are making progress, but there remains a potentially deadly gap between the urgency of the threat and the scope and pace of efforts to address it.
Download the Full Report (1.2 M PDF)
Выписки из доклада по-русски (423K PDF)

bullet

Controlling Nuclear Warheads and Materials:
A Report Card and Action Plan

2003 report published by Harvard and NTI measures the progress made in keeping nuclear weapons and materials out of terrorist hands, and outlines a comprehensive plan to reduce the danger.
Download the Full Report (2.7M PDF)

bullet

Securing Nuclear Weapons and Materials: Seven Steps for Immediate Action
2002 report co-published by Harvard and NTI outlines seven urgent steps to reduce the threat of stolen nuclear weapons or materials falling into the hands of terrorists or hostile states.
Read the Full Report (516K PDF)

Securing the Bomb

bulletRead 'Major Progress from Nuclear Security Summit' Summary

Securing the Bomb 2010

Securing the Bomb 2010: Securing All Nuclear Materials in Four Years

Securing the Bomb 2010, commissioned by the Nuclear Threat Initiative, finds that, in order to meet the four-year objective President Obama set in Prague in April 2009, global leaders must shift global nuclear security effort into a faster and broader trajectory.

Read the Full Report (2MB PDF)

Read the Executive Summary (423KB PDF)

Read the Release

dot If you would like to receive a free copy of the report in the mail, click here

Click here to go to the 'Latest Developments' Section

This web section provides comprehensive, "one-stop-shopping" information on the continuing danger that terrorists might get and use a nuclear bomb or the plutonium or highly enriched uranium (HEU) needed to make one – and programs to secure, monitor, and reduce nuclear stockpiles around the world, to keep them out of the hands of terrorists and hostile states.

Here, you can download the full text of our annual Securing the Bomb reports; access an on-line budget database for all U.S.-funded cooperative threat reduction programs, or browse hundreds of pages of information, scores of photographs, and hundreds of annotated web links on particular threats, programs to reduce them, and new steps that should be taken.

For more information on the Securing the Bomb web section, including what is included, what is not, and why, click here.

 

May 27-28, 2010
House and Senate Armed Services approve nuclear security funds

On May 27 and 28, the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate Armed Services Committee each approved versions of the defense authorization bill authorizing President Obama's request for a substantial increase in funds to finance the four-year effort to secure nuclear materials worldwide, the goal agreed at the nuclear security summit in April. (See the House bill here, and the Senate bill here.) Appropriators in both House and Senate need to approve the funds before they will become available, and analysts fear Congress may not pass the approprations bills on time, putting these programs on a continuing resolution that would mean more limited funds and slower progress. Analysts from the Fissile Materials Working Group urged appropriators to approve full funding for these programs. Matthew Bunn provided a briefing for Congress outlining the nuclear security issue, the importance of providing adequate funding, and options for Congress to reduce the risk of nuclear terrorism.

April 15, 2010
Last plutonium production reactor in Russia is shut down

On April 15, Russia's last operating plutonium production reactor in Zheleznogorsk was shut down, fulfilling a commitment by President Medvedev at the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington D.C.

Plutonium was produced by 13 reactors at three sites in Russia. Ten of these reactors were shut down between 1987 and 1992, and U.S. and Russian officials agreed to replace the remaining three plutonium production reactors with fossil-fuel plants. In recent years, the reactors operated only to provide heat and power to nearby communities. Two reactors at Seversk were shut down in 2008. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that the three reactors produced some 1.2 tons of plutonium annually. Zheleznogorsk had become infamous for the high suicide rate amongst the troops guarding the facility.

For more on Russia's plutonium stockpile, see pages 31-43 and 48-49 of Securing the Bomb 2010 and NTI's NIS Nuclear and Missile Database.

April 12-13, 2010
Major progress from nuclear security summit

Focusing the attention of presidents and prime ministers around the world on securing nuclear materials, the nuclear security summit was a major step toward locking down nuclear stockpiles around the world and keeping them out of terrorist hands. The assembled leaders identified nuclear terrorism as a major threat to global security and endorsed President Obama's goal of securing all vulnerable nuclear material worldwide within four years. Individual countries made important commitments to take steps to improve nuclear security, including:

  • Ukraine announced it would eliminate all its highly enriched uranium (HEU) by the end of 2012;
  • Canada announced that it would send a large stock of HEU back to the United States;
  • Mexico announced that it would convert its research reactor and eliminate the last HEU on its soil;
  • All HEU was removed from Chile just before the summit occurred;
  • Britain said that it would host an international peer review led by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of nuclear security at its Sellafield site, where over 100 tons of plutonium is stored — by far the most important and sensitive facility where such a review has ever been carried out, and a major step toward making such international reviews a normal part of doing business in the nuclear field, as international safety reviews are;
  • France also announced that it would host an IAEA‐led peer review

To follow up on the commitments made, the leaders agreed to hold another summit in South Korea in 2012, and the "sherpas" who help the leaders prepare for the summit plan to meet regularly between now and then.

The key now is to hit the ground running in turning the summit words into real action on the ground in the weeks and months to come. For an assessment of global nuclear security and a set of recommendations to achieve effective security for all nuclear stockpiles in four years, see Securing the Bomb 2010.

For more, see this analysis of the summit; key documents from the summit; a nuclear security summit press conference; and President Obama's post-summit press conference. See also the materials from a major non‐government summit on "Next Generation Nuclear Security" that was held the day before the nuclear security summit.

March 2010
HEU seized in Georgia – again

At the nuclear security summit in Washington in April 2010, Georgian president Mikhail Saakhashvili announced that in March 2010, Georgia security services had once again seized stolen highly enriched uranium (HEU), following up on confirmed seizures in Georgia in 2003 and 2006, to which the new case may be linked. Saakhashvili said that this was the eighth seizure of enriched uranium in Georgia so far. Georgian officials were quick to point to Russia as the source of these stolen materials, a charge Russian officials denied. Journalist Sharon Weinberger details the difficulties facing Georgian efforts to stop nuclear smuggling in Foreign Policy and Nature. The new case makes clear that nuclear theft and smuggling is not a hypothetical concern but an ongoing reality that must be addressed. Journalists Michael Bronner and Lawrence Sheets have provided detailed accounts of the 2006 case (and smuggler Oleg Khintsagov offers a jailhouse confession in the new film Countdown to Zero, which focuses heavily on nuclear terrorism and nuclear smuggling); a very useful analysis of the 2003 and 2006 cases by William Potter and Elena Sokova of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies was presented at a 2007 IAEA workshop on nuclear smuggling.

September 15, 2009
Hungarian Research Reactor Converted From HEU To Low-Enriched Uranium

On 15 September 2009, the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) announced that its Global Threat Reduction Initiative, in cooperation with Hungary's Atomic Energy Research Institute, had converted the highly enriched uranium (HEU)-fueled Budapest Research Reactor (BRR) to low enriched uranium. At the time, of a planned 129 research reactor conversions or shut downs worldwide by 2016, just over 50% had been completed (58 converted and 7 shut down). NNSA has since added another 71 reactors to its scope.

In July, 18 kilograms (40 pounds) of Russian-origin fresh HEU was removed from the BRR site. All Russian-origin HEU (fresh and spent) has been removed from Bulgaria, China, Georgia, Iraq, Latvia, and Romania. Belarus, the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Kazakhstan, North Korea, Libya, Poland, Serbia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam still have quantities of Russian-origin HEU on site.

Read NNSA's press release. For more on GTRI and the removal of HEU from high-risk sites, see the assessment on pp. 44-57 and 100-111 and the recommendations on pp. 140-147 of Securing the Bomb 2008 and the web section on Civilian HEU Reduction and Elimination.

July 6, 2009
Obama and Medvedev issue joint statement on nuclear cooperation

On 6 July 2009, Presidents Obama and Medvedev issued a joint statement outlining cooperative efforts to prevent nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism. While they provided little in the way of specifics, the presidents pledged increased support for existing nuclear security commitments such as: repatriating spent highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel, converting research reactors (including feasibility studies for Russian reactors) and minimizing the civilian use of HEU; implementing the U.S.-Russia Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement; "continuously improving" physical protection, accounting, and control of nuclear materials; and helping states around the world carry out their nonproliferation obligations under UN Security Council Resolution 1540. The two presidents also called for expanded nuclear energy cooperation, focused on developing innovative nuclear energy systems; providing reliable nuclear fuel cycle services; and improving the international safeguards system. They agreed to work to bring their bilateral nuclear cooperation ("123") agreement into force, to "provide the basis for these and other types of cooperation." To guide U.S.-Russian cooperation, the two agreed to establish a U.S.-Russian Bilateral Presidential Commission co-chaired by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, with a series of working groups, including a working group on nuclear energy and nuclear security led by Sergei Kirienko, head of Russia's Rosatom state corporation, and U.S. Deputy Secretary of Energy Daniel Poneman.

Obama and Medvedev also signed a Joint Understanding to guide START Follow-On Treaty negotiations, committing both sides to reduce their deployed strategic nuclear warheads to 1,500-1,675, and strategic delivery vehicles to 500-1,100. During the joint press conference, President Obama said that treaty will be completed this year.

Read the nuclear cooperation press release, Joint Understanding fact sheet and the joint press conference. For more on strategies to achieve effective and lasting nuclear security worldwide, see Chapter 5 of Securing the Bomb 2008 and Preventing Nuclear Terrorism: An Agenda for the Next President.


June 30, 2009
All HEU Removed From Romania

On 30 June 2009, the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) announced that all of the remaining Russian-origin highly enriched uranium (HEU) in Romania had been removed; all U.S.-origin HEU having been removed by 2008. Slightly less than 54 kilograms of spent and fresh HEU was transported to Russia in two shipments: 23.7 kilograms (52 pounds) of HEU in spent fuel from the Magurele research reactor was flown to the Mayak site; and 30 kilograms (66 pounds) of fresh HEU from the Institute for Nuclear Research in Pitesti was flown to the All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Atomic Reactors (NIIAR) in Dimitrovgrad. NNSA worked in close cooperation with Romania, Russia, and the IAEA to return the material.

In addition to Romania, all Russian-origin HEU has been removed from Georgia, Iraq, Latvia, and Bulgaria. In fiscal year (FY) 2010, GTRI plans to help repatriate 503 kilograms (1,109 pounds) of HEU fuel from Poland, Belarus, Germany, and Serbia to Russia.

Read NNSA's press release. For more on GTRI and the removal of HEU from high-risk sites, see the assessment on pp. 44-57 and 100-111 and the recommendations on pp. 140-147 of Securing the Bomb 2008, and the web section on Civilian HEU Reduction & Elimination.

bullet Also, see 'Past Developments' in the Securing the Bomb Archive.

Back to top

Belfer CenterThe Securing the Bomb section of the NTI website is produced by the Project on Managing the Atom (MTA) for NTI, and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. MTA welcomes comments and suggestions at atom@harvard.edu. Copyright 2007 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College.